Date: 18th January 2025
Course: Ascot (Right-Handed, 2 miles, Good going)
Prize: £8,986 to the winner
Age Restriction: 4-year-olds
Race Class: Class 3


—

Key Results & Commentary

1. Lulamba (FR) (4/5 Fav) – Winner

Performance: Delivered a commanding performance. Tracked the leaders and made significant progress approaching the last two hurdles. Took the lead before the final hurdle, showed agility by switching left, and quickened decisively in the final stretch to win easily.

Trainer: Nicky Henderson

Jockey: Nico de Boinville

Owner: Mrs J Donnelly

Conclusion: A classy, polished display. Lulamba’s dominance, especially in the closing stages, suggests he has significant potential going forward. A horse to watch in future juvenile hurdle contests.



2. Mondo Man (15/8) – 2nd (3.5 lengths behind)

Performance: Pulled hard early but settled into a rhythm behind the leaders. Made a notable effort to challenge Lulamba at the 5th hurdle but lacked the finishing pace to match the winner. Kept on to secure second place without troubling the leader.

Trainers: Gary and Josh Moore

Jockey: Caoilin Quinn

Owner: John And Yvonne Stone

Conclusion: A solid showing but may need to settle better in future races. Could thrive over slightly longer distances or against less dominant opponents.



3. Viyanni (IRE) (9/1) – 3rd (2.75 lengths behind 2nd)

Performance: Took the lead early and maintained it until the final stages. Struggled under pressure approaching the last hurdle and weakened in the run-in.

Trainer: Harry Derham

Jockey: Jonathan Burke

Owner: Olbg Racing Club

Conclusion: Showed early promise but lacked the stamina to maintain the lead. Potential for improvement with experience.



4. Ocean Conquest (150/1) – 4th (11 lengths behind 3rd)

Performance: Raced prominently early on but began to fade after a mistake at the 6th hurdle. Never threatened the leading trio.

Trainer: N A Twiston-Davies

Jockey: K K Woods

Conclusion: A long shot who performed as expected. May need a weaker field to compete more effectively.



5. St Pancras (28/1) – 5th (3 lengths behind 4th)

Performance: Raced wide and made no impact in the latter stages. Weakened significantly after the third-last hurdle.

Trainer: T Lawes

Jockey: Kevin Brogan

Conclusion: Showed little to suggest he could contend in similar-level races.



6. Moutarde (IRE) (14/1) – 6th (13 lengths behind 5th)

Performance: Trailed the field for most of the race and was unable to keep up after the third hurdle.

Trainer: Anthony Charlton

Jockey: Harry Cobden

Conclusion: Disappointing performance given his OR of 114. Likely needs a drop in class.



7. Wyld Bill (100/1) – 7th (3.75 lengths behind 6th)

Performance: Made errors early and faded badly before the final hurdles.

Trainer: J P Owen

Jockey: Sam Twiston-Davies

Conclusion: Poor performance; needs significant improvement to be competitive.





—

Race Trends & Observations

Pace: The race was run at a steady pace, with Lulamba producing a sharp turn of foot late on to secure victory.

Track Conditions: The “Good” ground played to the strengths of more agile runners, favouring Lulamba.

Notable Hurdling Technique: Lulamba and Mondo Man demonstrated consistent fluency over hurdles, while others like Wyld Bill and Ocean Conquest struggled with errors.

Future Potential: Lulamba looks like a standout prospect for upcoming juvenile hurdles or higher-class races. Mondo Man could perform better with a less enthusiastic start or over a slightly longer trip.



—

Betting & Market Analysis

Favourite: Lulamba (4/5 Fav) justified his position with an emphatic victory.

Second Favourite: Mondo Man (15/8) lived up to expectations as a strong contender but was outclassed in the final furlong.

Value Bet: Viyanni (9/1) showed early promise and offered decent returns for a place.

Long Shots: None of the longer-priced horses made a significant impact.



—

Conclusion

The race was dominated by Lulamba, who showcased superior speed and racecraft. While Mondo Man and Viyanni offered commendable efforts, they were no match for the winner’s quality. The rest of the field underperformed or ran to expectations in a competitive but one-sided contest.